Apple Is A Religion: Neuroscientists Find Both Trigger The Same Reaction In Your Brain

  x You have successfully emailed the post. Apple employees go nuts at a store opening in London.

Image: BBC

The cult of Apple is real, according to neuroscientists.

They compared MRIs of Apple fans' brains to those of people who call themselves "very religious" and found that Apple and religion light up the same part of the brain. This means that Apple triggers the same feelings and reactions in people as religion.

BBC highlights the finding in an upcoming documentary, Secrets of Superbrands.

The documentary also likens Apple Stores to cathedrals. "Apple stores often feature stone or other types of austere, simple flooring like a church with products mounted on pedestals like individual altars," writes Inc's Renee Oricchio.

Apple store launches are like religious experiences too. "The scenes I witnessed at the opening of the new Apple store in London's Covent Garden were more like an evangelical prayer meeting than a chance to buy a phone or a laptop," writes Alex Riley and Adam Boome of BBC.

"Inside the store, glassy-eyed staff were whipped up into a frenzy of excitement, jumping up and down, clapping and shouting. When the doors finally opened, they hysterically "high-fived" and cheered hundreds of delirious customers flooding in through the doors for hours on end."

It seems Steve Jobs really is a God to some people.

For the latest tech news, visit SAI: Silicon Alley Insider. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook.

x

To embed this post, copy the code below and paste into your website or blog.

View the original article here

The 18 Longest-Serving CEOs

  x You have successfully emailed the post.

CEOs seldom keep their spot at the helm of a single company for long, but occasionally a select few manage to stick in the same place for decades.

Many of their names have become synonymous with the companies they helped grow into global empires.

How did they manage to do it?

We've compiled a list of 18 current CEOs of public companies -- with upwards of $10 billion in revenue, according to Fortune -- who have stayed in the same spot for 15 years or more.

For the latest career news, visit War Room. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook.

x

To embed this post, copy the code below and paste into your website or blog.

View the original article here

Silicon Valley Guru Steve Blank Welcomes The New Bubble And Says Microsoft Is Doomed

Steve Blank is the closest thing Silicon Valley has to a guru.

The serial entrepreneur turned writer and professor has a big theory: entrepreneurship is a skill that can be taught.

At Stanford and Berkeley, Blank teaches scientists to get out of their labs and find real customers for their ideas -- without getting bogged down in the traditional MBA weeds of spreadsheets and revenue models.

Blank and a few other like minds traveled a lonesome road earlier this decade, but now their ideas are broadly admired, and they help inspire the current crop of startups coming out of the Valley -- and the angel investors and VCs who fund them.

We caught up with the outspoken professor to talk about the state of the tech business today.

Highlights from our conversation:

The LinkedIn IPO "absolutely" marks the beginning of a bubble -- and he thinks it's going to be great. He likens it to the Netscape IPO in August 1995 that kicked off four years of boom times, but notes that this time VCs actually know how to build real companies with real revenue and profit.Crazy investors -- not geeks -- are what makes Silicon Valley unique. Without the "crazy" financiers willing to take big risks in hopes of chasing "obscene" returns, the valley would just be "a bunch of smart scientists and entrepreneurs sitting in their labs and their garages."Microsoft will start to fail within six quarters. Blank put a timeline on Microsoft suffering the kind of huge loss that drove IBM to restructure itself back in 1993: six quarters from now. He thinks Steve Ballmer is a "miserable failure" and that the board should be blamed for not replacing him. He also suggests that buying Nokia and installing Stephen Elop as CEO might be a solution.But Larry Page is doing the right thing at Google. By letting the geeks run the show, Page is following in the footsteps of one of the earliest Silicon Valley pioneers: Fairchild Semiconductor in the 1950s.

Here's a lightly edited transcript of the full interview.

Business Insider: Let's start with the big LinkedIn IPO this week. Do you think we're at the beginning of another big tech boom like the 90s?

Steve Blank. Absolutely. Tech boom and bubble. Away we go. I think it's going to be great.

BI: So you'd call it a bubble?

SB: Oh absolutely. There's no rational basis for the valuations. It doesn't mean it's a bad company, it just means that we're now into buying things because we think the sector's going to be hot and there's going to be more to follow.

I also think we're much smarter this time. Last bubble, we didn't say it was a bubble. We said it was the new normal. Now at least journalists and financial analysts are being smart and asking "what does this mean and when does it end?" I think it's not March 2000, I think it's August 1995 -- Netscape's IPO. It'll bring a lot of cash and innovation into technology clusters.

BI: Other than the fact that people recognize it as a bubble, do you see any other differences between what's happening today and what was happening in the late '90s?

SB: It may be instructive to remember what happened before the late '90s. VCs tutored their companies on how to grow revenues and how to get customers. Up to August '95, you couldn't take a company public through any of the boutique technology players, the Hambrechts, the Robertsons, the Montgomerys, without having five quarters of increasing profitability and revenue.

August '95 through March 2000, the rules changed because there was an unending appetite in the financial markets -- VCs didn't have anything to do with it, it was the investment banks and the public. So venture capitalists -- because they're smart and organized to optimize profits for their limited partners -- stopped being company builders and started becoming financial engineers. Startups and Silicon Valley companies were no longer building revenue or profits, they were building slideware and concept and hype. If it had the letter "e" or "Internet" it was a concept IPO.

Post-crash, VCs picked through the rubble and spent the last decade building companies. This bubble is beginning not with hype, but built on the rubble on the last one. These first 10, 20, 50 companies coming out that have filed have real revenue, real profits, real customers. I think that's dramatically different between this bubble and the last. I'm not concerned about the first wave of companies.

We also know now, which we didn't 10 years ago, how to eliminate the egregious infant mortality risks. It used to be war stories. Now I can probably say "talk to me about your customers" after 6 months. If you can't do that, I can't guarantee you're going to fail but you're sure not on a high probability trajectory.

"Tell me what you found outside the building." "Oh, we're still working on the spec." Not a good sign.

BI: So explain your concept of lean startups, what that is and why it works.

SB: Venture capital and technology entrepreneurship is at best 50 years old in its modern form. What we did for the first 50 years of startups was get it wrong. We treated startups as smaller versions of large companies. We said "everything you do for these large companies -- business plans, you need to write one. VPs of sales -- you need to have one. Revenue plans -- you need to execute that. Everything they do at IBM, you need to do in your startup, just a smaller version."

It took 50 years to realize why that's wrong. Large companies execute known business models, while startups search for a business model. The distinction between execution and search is huge. People who execute are incredibly uncomfortable in a chaotic environment, and people who are wonderfully comfortable in chaos go crazy in an execute environment. Business plans, which are great for your second and third product in a large company, are a joke in a startup when it's all a series of unknowns.

My work, Alexander Osterwalder, Eric Ries, and others are now creating the equivalent of a parallel stack -- what you learned in business school for execution, we're now teaching what you learn for search.

BI: I've heard some people criticize the angel model in that it encourages small ideas and small exits. Would you like to see more startups going for big, groundbreaking, home run ideas?

SB: I think that's people looking through the wrong end of the telescope. Those observations are wrong. Big ideas haven't gone away -- VCs writing $10 million checks haven't gone away. Even clean tech hasn't gone away. Adam Grosser raising $2 billion for a clean tech fund out of Silverlake. Elon Musk isn't putting rockets into space for 100 grand or doing Tesla [for cheap]. These are big money ideas.

We now have a methodology, we know how to time the money, so there's very few business cases where you should be taking tens of millions of dollars on day one, even for big ideas.

For example Facebook -- they could have raised a ton of money up front, but you don't need it up front, you need it in the back.

BI: What about big established companies like Google and Microsoft? How can they overcome the innovator's dilemma and recapture some of the energy of the startup world?

Next Page: Microsoft Is Toast.

View the original article here

Caterina Fake: How To Avoid The Pressure Of The Startup "Sophomore Slump"

Athletes and musicians aren’t the only people who need to worry about the dreaded "sophomore slump."

Flickr co-founder Caterina Fake says it applies to entrepreneurship as well, and that it’s a risk every entrepreneur faces after a successful exit.

“You have to be aware of it and you have to not be afraid to fail," she said.

"You end up having all of these interviews with reporters who are crediting the reason you’re getting all this attention not to what you’re currently working on, but for the past success,” she said.

“The expectations are high, and everybody’s watching what you’re doing. To fail is even more risky than when you did it the first time around because the expectations are such that, ‘founder of well-known company X is now doing a new thing, and maybe it’s not actually very good.' That’s actually a greater fall from grace than if nobody knows who the heck you are and you’re just starting out.”

She said it sets you up in a position where there’s more to lose, and when there’s more to lose, people tend to take fewer risks. “It’s something you have to be perpetually looking out for. You have to keep on doing what you do.”

Fake said she started taking business risks when she was a little kid.

“I was one of those kids that always had a lemonade stand, a newspaper route and a little business that I created of selling knick-knacks that I had made,” she said. “I think that it was always an impulse that I had, and the manifestation of that was also that I wasn’t a good person working at a regular job that had a start time and an end time. I wasn’t very successful at that, so it trended naturally that way.”

She spent time living in Vancouver, which is where she started photo-sharing site Flickr. She and co-founder Stewart Butterfield launched the site in February 2004, and it was acquired by Yahoo in 2005 for a reported $30 million. Fake has said that the company kept its heart even after it was acquired, and credits the Yahoo team.

“I think it had the good fortune of good caretakers, the people who were managing it afterwards understood what it was and had a good understanding of what the heart of it was,” she said. “That’s a very important thing when your company has been acquired, you want to make sure that the heart and soul of it don’t get lost. It’s a very common thing for a company to come in and impose whatever the local culture is. The people at Yahoo really understood what it was.”

Fake also credits the Flickr community with maintaining the culture.

“It’s a really strong community, and it’s a really strong culture, and a lot of that was also because the contributors to Flickr were very strong as well,” she said.

Today Flickr is hosting more than five billion images, and counts U.S. President Barack Obama as a user. Fake says she always hoped the company would reach the level it’s at today. “You always hope that when you build a company it will thrive as it has. I think the lifespan of it is quite impressive,” she said.

She also said it’s been amazing to see photos on Flickr of President Obama with his family.

“The Obama administration especially has been very active on Flickr, which is a wonderful thing to see. From the campaign through the inauguration.  Throughout his administration there have been some amazing photographs put on Flickr.”

Fake joined Yahoo after the acquisition in 2005 and stayed until early 2008. She launched her latest venture, Hunch, in 2009. The company provides recommendations based on users’ preferences, and is trying to build an online ‘taste graph.’ Though Fake’s role has come in to question in recent months, she said she’s pleased with the direction the company went in after it pivoted.

“All of the recommendations that you see on Hunch are contributed by users, and I think this is a really important part of the service because if you are able to capture human activity, you’re always able to make technology work in a much better way than it would without the human input.” 

She said she’s proud to have contributed to the community aspects that carry on to this day. ”We’re centering on a theme here of setting things up well in the beginning.  Constantly putting good back into the products that you build and the life that you lead is a very important thing to do.”

Though she could be comfortable with a big exit under her belt, with a new startup and investments in companies including DailyBooth and Etsy, Fake said it’s important continue to take risks as an entrepreneur.

“It’s about doing things that you haven’t done before, where you’re still kind of a beginner, and not resting on your laurels,” she said.  “It’s a hard thing to do--there’s a ton of research that’s been done that shows that people are more afraid of losing what they’ve already acquired than of taking a risk and building something new. This is a really common quality, that you want to hang on to what you’ve already got.”

Flickr is credited with pioneering many of the user-generated content features associated with social networks today, like tagging and marking photos as favorites.  Fake’s background is in online comm unites and user-generated content. Now that she’s an active angel investor and partner at Founder Collective, she said she’s drawn to companies that incorporate community participation--a “human” aspect as she calls it. These companies include fundraising platform Kickstarter and art community 20×200.

“There’s a very common theme if you look at the investments that I do, those are all things that have some aspect of user-generated content, creativity, self-expression. There’s something very human about all of those companies, the things that they create. That has been the type of company that I am very much drawn to.”

She said that while the founders of her portfolio companies are very different, they all have the same passion for community.

“The founders themselves are all very different. They have the same intuition about products, about how to create and build communities, how to sustain communities, how to create contributory systems.

“Kickstarter is growing like wildfire, and the reason for that is they’ve really found an amazing way of putting people together in a very human way. They’re really good at highlighting certain projects and matching creators and their funders. I see the same thing happening with 20×200, where they have created a great audience full of artists in the art world, which is actually a very difficult world to penetrate.”

She said that while the companies’ products and services differ, they have a lot in common: great products, great communities, community-building, self-expression, creativity and something very human.

She believes entrepreneurs flourish under apprenticeship, and said angel investors are often great teachers.

“A lot of the time the people that are doing angel investing--it’s very common for them to be entrepreneurs themselves. I am an angel investor and I have very close relationships with many of the people. I interact with them very frequently. Often you can find good mentors in the angel community.”

She says that mentorship doesn’t have to be one-on-one, though. Online resources can be the best source of knowledge for new entrepreneurs.

“You can learn from other people’s experiences, they write about them all the time and publish all kinds of articles and blog posts,” she said. “There’s amazing information out there about entrepreneurship, which didn’t exist when I was starting out in the early 2000s. I don’t necessarily think you need a single person to be your mentor; you can learn from everybody. The best way to do it is to just engage in the conversation. Participate, be in the community.”

View the original article here

Most People Are Daydreaming 46% Of The Time

  x You have successfully emailed the post. If you've ever been to a yoga class, your teacher probably harped on you about "mindfulness," or being present -- because it puts you in a better mood. 

Now Harvard psychologists Matthew A. Killingsworth and Daniel Gilbert confirmed that the centuries-old Buddhist practice is worth paying attention to.

Using an iPhone app called trackyourhappiness, researchers asked 2,200 people globally to respond to text messages at any given moment, explaining what they were doing and how happy they were. After sifting through 25,000 text messages, Killingsworth and Gilbert found that 46% of the time, people were daydreaming, and they weren't all that happy. The ones who were fully engaged in an activity were happiest. 

“A human mind is a wandering mind, and a wandering mind is an unhappy mind,” they said in the study, which was published in Science magazine. “The ability to think about what is not happening is a cognitive achievement that comes at an emotional cost.”

Basically, we're more likely to think negative thoughts if we let our minds wander. And it makes sense that commuters and people waiting in line are more irritable. “We see evidence for mind-wandering causing unhappiness, but no evidence for unhappiness causing mind-wandering,” Mr. Killingsworth told the New York Times.

Perhaps we could take the advice of William F. Buckley Jr., who once said, "Industry is the enemy of melancholy."

For the latest career news, visit War Room. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook.

x

To embed this post, copy the code below and paste into your website or blog.

View the original article here

Women-Owned Firms Aren't Growing Due To A Lack Of Role Models

It’s a great time to be an entrepreneur, and now there’s data to prove it: women have been starting businesses at 1.5 times the national rate and now account for 29 percent of all company owners in the U.S.

But this data, presented in the recent American Express OPEN Report, also revealed a new glass ceiling. While most women-owned businesses exceed their peers in key success measurements — revenue growth and number of employees — this trend stumbles at the highest levels of business size and achievement.

The report, the first to analyze the latest U.S. Census data and provide a view of business ownership over the last 14 years, found that at the 100-employee and $1 million revenue levels, the number of women-owned firms dives below that of men-owned and public ally-owned companies. Even more strikingly, women-owned firms only employ six percent of the total U.S. workforce.

What’s going on? And what needs to be done to help female entrepreneurs succeed beyond the small-business level? We sat down with the report’s author, Julie Weeks, to learn more about her findings and what they mean for the future of women-owned businesses.

Entrepreneurship is the next professional frontier. Women are increasingly more likely to hold senior-level positions in the workplace, and that gives them excellent skills with which to start a business. Women also have higher levels of education than ever before, and are more likely to have the kinds of degrees that can lead to greater success in business ownership, such as business or law.

Also, many women want the flexibility that comes with business ownership. Even though, as an entrepreneur, you will work much harder than you would otherwise, you are in charge of your own destiny.  That’s very appealing to a lot of women.

Though women-owned firms are growing, they are not accounting for a very large share in the nation’s overall employment and revenue. So we took a look beyond those statistics to see what’s going on, and found that women-owned firms are really keeping up the pace in terms of revenue and employment growth fairly far along the business growth spectrum. Overall women are doing as well as the average firm, all the way to the $1 million in revenue and 100 employee mark.

That’s when they falter off the pace. Some might think that women-owned firms are starting small and staying small, and that’s not really true. They are growing…up until a certain point.

Certainly, the population of women-owned firms is younger than the population of men-owned firms. But it is more than that. I believe it has to do with the lack of role models, peers, and mentors, and that there are fewer women at that rarefied atmosphere. The informal networks that help business owners get doors opened for them are less available to women. The kind of capital that is required at that level is very much a referral-based system, and there are fewer women engaged in that system on both sides of the table.

What needs to happen on a systemic level to improve this?

From a public policy and a business support point of view, there has been far more attention paid to getting people into business than to supporting their growth once they’ve started. Widening the lens of business support beyond the startup is very important. We need to put attention on the “missing middle."

There is a lot of attention paid to startups, and then everyone salivates at the other end of the spectrum at the IPO-bound, fast-growth businesses. More attention paid to the middle would boost growth rates of the foundational businesses that are employing people, that do a lot for the economic vitality of local communities.

And particularly for the women’s business sector, paying more attention to growth-oriented support, making women’s business networks more available and mentoring programs more visible and active, and having a broader dialogue about what growth and success means would all help.

Traditional success only looks at financial goals: go public or get bigger and bigger. But a lot of women are put off by that discussion and want to grow their business a little more organically. Women are more likely to look at the “triple bottom line” (that is, taking into account a firm’s ecological and social impact rather than solely profit). Our dialogue and lexicon about success and what we want to achieve as business owners is minimized and taken less seriously since it’s not as testosterone-charged, and that does women a disservice.

But, there’s an increasing discussion that “profit above everything” isn’t good in the long run for communities and for the planet.  Taking into account the impact of a business on the community and environment is a very important discussion to have. There are many communities that are hollowed out when one large company moves to another area, and without strong small businesses present, that community is left in a lurch. Big isn’t always best, growth for growth’s sake is not always the ultimate goal, and recognizing that there are different ways to lead a business is very important.

What better time to jump into charting your own future? If you get tied into a career path working for other people, you may be shutting off potential options for your future. And there’s a lot of support out there for young women interested in business ownership, and I think those resources are going to continue to increase.

Young professionals now have a much broader view and bigger sense that the sky’s the limit if you start a business, because you’re seeing all of the Mark Zuckerbergs out there. Not everyone will get that far that fast, but the more we show examples of younger people who have been successful very early in their careers, all the better.

I think perhaps they’re out there, but we're not looking close enough. I hope they’re out there! Or that they will be.

View the full report: American Express OPEN State of Women-Owned Business Report.

Julie R. Weeks is President and CEO of Womenable, a for-profit social enterprise that works to enable women’s entrepreneurship worldwide. She has over 30 years' experience in the fields of research design and analysis, public policy, and women's enterprise development. Prior to launching Womenable in 2005, Weeks was Executive Director of the National Women's Business Council and Managing Director and Director of Research for the Center for Women's Business Research.

View the original article here

IDEA OF THE DAY: Get 25% Of The World's Beer Drinkers (Women) To Drink More

  x You have successfully emailed the post. Image: Carlsberg

The idea: Enclose a 4.5% alcohol beer in a well-designed bottle, skip the obnoxious television commercials, and place it on the shelves of high-end bars across Denmark this year (the beer is called "Copenhagen"), then roll it out to the rest of Europe and parts of Asia in 2012. 

Whose idea: Carlsberg

Why it's brilliant: The "Copenhagen" is marketed as an alternative to white wine or champagne.

For the latest career news, visit War Room. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook.

x

To embed this post, copy the code below and paste into your website or blog.

View the original article here

The Most Important Decision You Make Happens At Age 12

  x You have successfully emailed the post.

We were all asked "What do you want to be when you grow up?" probably a million times during our childhood. It's no wonder that we felt pressure to come up with an answer.

Last year, literary critic William Deresiewicz advised Stanford University's freshman class to reevaluate the decisions they made at age 12, or 19. He said that too often, people continue on with a path because it's safe and conventional. Not that we all need to be Mark Zuckerberg or Ralph Lauren.

"Maybe you did always want to be a cardiac surgeon. You dreamed about it from the time you were 10 years old, even though you had no idea what it really meant, and you stayed on course for the entire time you were in school," he said. "Who wants to live with the decisions that they made when they were 12? Let me put that another way. Who wants to let a 12-year-old decide what they're going to do for the rest of their lives? Or a 19-year-old, for that matter?"

Basically, he told them to grow up. Maturity means you have to make tough, thoughtful decisions. 

He even went so far as to say today's young people are part of a "postemotional" generation: "You prefer to avoid messy and turbulent and powerful feelings."

Without introspection, "You go from being a political-science major to being a lawyer to being a corporate attorney to being a corporate attorney focusing on taxation issues in the consumer-products industry."

And is that where you wanted to go?

For the latest career news, visit War Room. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook.

x

To embed this post, copy the code below and paste into your website or blog.

View the original article here

This Is The Best Way An Entrepreneur Has Ever Spent His FU Money

New Zealander Derek Handley's mobile marketing company, The Hyperfactory, was acquired last year by Meredith Corporation for an undisclosed amount.

Last month, he gave a speech at Kea, New Zealand's global network, about his life as an entrepreneur and explained what he did with the money from the acquisition.

Handley wanted to buy three things, and they weren't a mansion or a yacht:

1. A trip to Africa

2. A ticket to space

3. A letter Napoleon wrote to his generals

In his speech, he explains his unusual purchases.

"19,392 is apparently the number of days that I have left to live," Handley starts. 

"And although it sounds like a lot, over the last few years I've come to realize that it probably takes you a good five years to achieve something meaningful. Turns out that 19,392 is really only 10 of those 5 year blocks. So when you think about having to achieve ten things and that's all you've got, you'll be much wiser in how you spend each of those chapters..."

"...When I was 21 and starting out, I was aspiring to be an entrepreneur, because I wanted to build businesses," Handley says. "I wanted to make a living, I wanted to make a mark, and I really wanted to make money.

"Ten years on, after this period I started to see things very differently and I started to see entrepreneurship as one of the greatest assets of society to make the world a potentially better place. As an answer to many of the world's ills, and as an enabler to much of the world's opportunity."

So, 30-year-old Handley took his "FU money" and made his three purchases.

"First, I went to Africa and discovered and learned all about how entrepreneurship and microfinance and microloans were empowering microentrepreneurs to lift themselves out of poverty in the present.

"Second, I bought a ticket to space with Richard Branson's Virgin Galactic [which costs $200,000] because I wanted to see the world from up there as one and be inspired by the future.

"And third, I bought that letter that Napoleon had written to remind myself of the past, and to never give up."

This is the Napoleon letter Handley bought (he used it as inspiration when The Hyperfactory was on the verge of failure):

We are at a time when you need to double the resolve, and double the vigor of ordinary times.  Lead by example. Be the first to put yourself in danger. And with the troops that you have, I expect you to defeat double of theirs.

The full speech is 20 minutes long, but if you have time and want to be inspired, watch it:

Derek Handley from World Class New Zealand on Vimeo.

View the original article here

Waiting Tables Is Now A Full-Fledged Career

Waiting Tables Is Now A Full-Fledged Career Login With Facebook | Login With Twitter | Login | Register War Room Contributors Home Tech Media Wall Street Markets Strategy Sports Lifestyle Politics Travel Misc. Video Latest Management Hiring & Firing Founders' Corner Instant MBA HiveTapePRQuestionsContributors

Enter you email address and zip code to set up customized email alerts.

Email Zip Waiting Tables Is Now A Full-Fledged Career Clarissa Cruz, Inc. | May 20, 2011, 3:39 PM | 79 | 1 A A A   x Email Article From To Email Sent! You have successfully emailed the post.

Clarissa CruzClarissa Cruz is the former Style Editor of People magazine and has written for Entertainment Weekly, InStyle, Food & Wine, and Budget Travel.

How to Survive Bad Press Neurologists: Apple Triggers Religious Reaction Advertisement: How To Lose Funding in One Tweet Building Customer Loyalty
See Also: The Top Mobster Restaurants Around The CountryWhere Your Favorite NBA Stars EatIS COLLEGE WORTH IT? 57 Percent Of Americans Say Nope
As the old joke goes, two people meet at a party. Guest 1 asks Guest 2 what he does for a living. "I'm an actor," he answers. "Ah," Guest 1 says, nodding. "What restaurant do you work at?"

Being a server has traditionally been the ideal job for aspiring actors, models, and artists since well, forever. The flexible hours, social interaction and possibility of generous tips (especially if one is hot, according to a study by Cornell University), make it the perfect occupation for someone trying to make good money while aspiring to be something else. 

But more and more servers are taking waiting tables more seriously, seeing it not as a side job, but as a full-fledged career. "It's not a particularly new phenomenon in Europe or in fine dining," says Philip Iordanu, general manager at the New York City restaurant Beaumarchais. "But I do think that both waiting and cooking are becoming more legitimate career choices with the glamorization of the restaurant industry in the media, which is a very positive shift."

Anthony Breyer, 28, started waiting tables to earn extra money while he was a college student—and soon found himself wanting more than just a job in restaurants. "During the daily pre-shift meetings, when we taste new dishes, learn about wines and service points, I began to develop a genuine enthusiasm for the job," he says. "I began seeking out further information and practice on my own time and that's when it began to evolve as a career for me."

He's now been a waiter for 9 years, and on staff at Beaumarchais for the past year. He supplements his service knowledge with wine classes and often attends the pairings and tastings held at the restaurant where he works. Breyer also goes to other well-regarded eateries to observe the staff's behavior and to try new dishes. "It's a rare thing these days for someone to spend the majority of their time doing something they love with people they enjoy," says Breyer, who cites Danny Meyer's Setting the Table as a must-read for anyone mulling over a waiting career. "And the service industry allows me to do just that."

This post originally appeared at Inc. To read more, check out:

The Best Industries to Start and Grow a Business in 2011 > > Jason Fried: Why I Run a Flat Company > > For the latest career news, visit War Room. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook.

Tags: Inc., Restaurants, Career | Get Alerts for these topics » Advertisement: Short URL Share: Twitter Facebook Buzz Digg StumbleUpon Buzz Reddit LinkedIn Email More about embedding posts » Embed More about Alerts » Alerts Newsletter x

To embed this post, copy the code below and paste into your website or blog.

600px wide (preview)400px wide (preview) 300px wide (preview) The Water Cooler
Receive email updates on new comments!Email1 Comment 0 0 Flag as Offensive Librarian on May 20, 11:40 PM said: Welcome to the new reality for the average American worker. Did you save room for dessert? Reply Join the discussionLogin With FacebookLogin With TwitterName (Required)Email Address (Required but never displayed)URLComments (You may use HTML tags for style) Get Business Insider Emails & Alerts Learn More »Customized instant email alerts(sample)More:Business Insider Select(sample)SAI Select(sample)The Wire Select(sample)Clusterstock Select(sample)Money Game Select(sample)War Room Select(sample)Sports Page Select(sample)Politix Select(sample)Lifestyle Select(sample)Tools Select(sample)SAI Chart Of The Day(sample)Clusterstock Chart Of The Day(sample)10 Things In Tech You Need To Know(sample)10 Things Before the Opening Bell(sample)Politics in 60 Seconds(sample)Instant MBA(sample)Marketing Mondays(sample)Apple Investor(sample)Google Investor(sample)Microsoft Investor(sample)Breaking News Alerts(sample) Advertisement Your MoneyLinkedIn's Big Market Debut

CONGRATULATIONS, LINKEDIN! You Just Got Screwed Out Of $130 MillionCRAMER ON LINKEDIN (LNKD): "Outrageous!" "Ridiculous!" "Preposterous!"Where LinkedIn's Revenue Comes FromThese People Just Got Filthy Rich From The LinkedIn IPOHere Are The Lessons Of LinkedInBONUS: Here Are The Next Big Tech IPOs Investors Will Go Nuts For Become a ContributorRead Me13 People Who Got Fired For Tweeting 11

Tweeting Glee spoilers was a bad idea.

– Dylan Love

The 15 Most Ridiculous Trademark Attempts Ever 9– Alana Horowitz

The 29 Most Valuable Brands In The World 29– Dylan Love and Gus Lubin

Why Every Internet Marketer Should Watch The Justin Bieber Movie 10– Jim Larrison

INSTANT MBA: America Needs Plumbers More Than It Needs You 12– Dylan Love

Slow Down, Sell Faster: A Review– Small Business Trends

How To Make Your Business More Efficient– Deborah Sweeney

A Playbook For Using Social Media In Your Company (INFOGRAPHIC)– OnlineMBA

Whatever You Feel Compelled To Do, Don't– Tony Schwartz

Good Entrepreneurs Can Grow A Business Without A Large Budget– Martin Zwilling

How Long Can Employees Live on a Compliment?– Dan Day

The Hidden Power of Smiling– Tim Berry

More »Most Read Read  Commented 

12 Places To Go If The World Goes To Hell 1,118,704 Views

Here Are The Amazing Color Photos Of The Great Depression That Everyone Is Talking About 654,312 Views

These People Just Got Filthy Rich From The LinkedIn IPO 181,292 Views

50 Things Every American Should Know About The Collapse Of The Economy 161,192 Views

Introducing Wall Street's Hottest Offspring 148,530 Views

Obama Just Announced Support For The 1967 Israel Borders, And Here's How It's Going Over 140 Comments

CONGRATULATIONS, LINKEDIN! You Just Got Screwed Out Of $130 Million 110 Comments

Here Are The Amazing Color Photos Of The Great Depression That Everyone Is Talking About 71 Comments

Unbelievably Humiliating Photo Of DSK In Jail Wearing A Suicide Prevention Smock 60 Comments

Netanyahu Officially Tells Obama That A Return To 1967 Borders Isn't Going To Happen 55 Comments

Advertisement Thanks to our partners A-Z Index Companies Authors Tags Site MapLatestContributorsVideo Tools Stock Quotes Job Listings Lists & Rankings Digital 100 Silicon Alley 100 Silicon Valley 100 Clusterstock 50 America's Best Colleges Best Business Schools Sexiest CEOs More Your Account Register Change Your Email Preferences About BI About Jobs at BI Masthead Contact Advertise Mobile Follow BI Email Newsletters Alerts RSS Twitter LinkedIn Facebook Verticals Tech Media Wall Street Markets StrategySportsTravelToolsPoliticsPRMisc.Lifestyle

* Copyright © 2011 Business Insider, Inc. All rights reserved. Registration on or use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Serviceand Privacy Policy.| Disclaimer

Powered by MongoDB | Hosted by Datapipe | Web analytics by Empirical Path

View the original article here

A Tip For All CEOs: Do You Have To Attend That Meeting?

  x You have successfully emailed the post.

Yesterday we had our first Founder Summit in NYC. We gathered over 50 founders and CEOs together to provide learnings and lessons on a variety of shared topics.

I want to thank all that attended and participated. 

We also had a few guest speakers come in. Ray Ozzie gave a talk about his passion & insight about social and mobile. And it was super cool to hear about his experiences on one of the earliest online communities

Our friend David Rosenblatt also led a discussion about his experiences running DoubleClick in good times, bad times and then turning it around and eventually sold to Google for over $3B. David is the cofounder of Group Commerce which is a Spark portfolio company and David is also on the Twitter board with me. David is a pure kick ass operator.

David shared a number of lessons and suggestions. One notable one was how a CEO can know whether his/her senior management team is performing. One method David discussed is for the CEO to carefully review his/her own calendar and review all upcoming meetings over the next few weeks.

Then identify which meetings absolutely require the CEO and which ones don’t. If the CEO is going to meetings that should be able to run without him/her then there is likely a problem with the person running that team.

Now, there are plenty of meetings that require a CEO’s direct attention particularly in the early days. But if you get to a place where you have senior executives reporting to you then looking at your calender will give you a sense if you have a problem or not.

I thought it was great advice and something I will make sure I discuss with all of our CEOs that are now running larger organizations.

This post originally appeared at Bijasabet.com.

For the latest tech news, visit SAI: Silicon Alley Insider. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook.

x

To embed this post, copy the code below and paste into your website or blog.

View the original article here

Brazilian Woman Wins The Right To Masturbate And Watch Porn At Work

  x You have successfully emailed the post. Image: hahajk

Brazilian Ana Catarian Bezerra suffers from a chemical imbalance that triggers severe anxiety and hyper sexuality. To cope she masturbates around 47 times a day, sometimes at the office.

When the accounting company she works for complained, Bezerra took them to court. And won.

Translated by Guanabee from Analitica:

After winning a court battle and seeking professional medical help, Ana is allowed to masturbate and watch porn — using her work's computer, no less — legally.

Carlos Howert, Ana's doctor, prescribes Ana with a "cocktail" (read: an entire medicine cabinet's worth) of tranquillizers. We're not sure how that "cocktail" doesn't knock Ana out (half a Claritin feels like an elephant tranquillizer to us), but thanks to Dr. Howert's concoction, Ana only has to masturbate around eighteen-times a day.

For the latest news, visit Business Insider. Follow us on Twitter and Facebook.

x

To embed this post, copy the code below and paste into your website or blog.

View the original article here

Entrepreneur Magazine Has Trademarked The Word "Entrepreneur" And Is Suing Some Businesses That Use It

Entrepreneur Magazine has a trademark on the word "entrepreneur," and is suing some businesses that use it.

In 1979, Entrepreneur's founder, Chase Revel, got a U.S. trademark for the word "entrepreneur." Since then he has successfully sued EntrepreneurPR, EntrepreneurOlogy.com and others.

Bloomberg talked to a few entrepreneurs that were crushed by Entrepreneur:

Daniel R. Castro, a serial entrepreneur in Austin, Tex., received a stern letter from EMI's lawyers last September ordering him to "cease and desist" using his new website, EntrepreneurOlogy.com. In his day, Castro, 50, has started a law firm, a mortgage company, and a real estate-lending outfit. He employs a half-dozen people full-time and coordinates the work of a platoon of brokers. He also delivers motivational speeches to other business owners and hopes the new website will provide an online home for a workshop series. "I was dumbfounded," he says of the cease-and-desist letter. Like a lot of people who work for themselves, he doesn't like to be told what to do. "Their problem," he says of EMI, "was that they didn't know who they were picking on."

An attorney with the corporate law firm Latham & Watkins informed Castro that EMI owns the U.S. trademark for the word "entrepreneur." With 2,000 lawyers in 31 offices around the world, Latham polices EMI's intellectual property aggressively. The firm even instructed Castro to surrender his domain name to EMI. "If you fail to abide by these demands," the letter said, "Entrepreneur Media will have no choice but to take appropriate action to prevent continued use of an infringing mark and domain name."

Read the rest at Bloomberg.

Of course there's another way to look at this story. Entrepreneur promoters smart entrepreneurship, and there's nothing smarter than getting a trademark.

View the original article here